How Employers Should Set Recruitment SLAs With an Overseas Manpower Agency
When an overseas worker leaves soon after arriving, the first instinct is often to ring the agency and ask for a replacement. I understand why. The vacancy gets filled, but nobody has actually found out why the first person left, and if the cause was the role itself, the accommodation, the supervision or something they were told (or not told) before they travelled, there’s a decent chance the replacement walks straight into the same problem.
You can reduce overseas worker attrition with fixes that are, honestly, fairly unglamorous: better job matching, being accurate about the employment conditions, and practical support through the first few weeks. On top of that, I’d keep an eye on retention from the moment an offer is accepted, through onboarding and into early employment, and I’d make a habit of asking workers how things are going, because a lot of what goes wrong never shows up in the recruitment figures.
To be clear, you won’t stop every departure, and you shouldn’t try to. People leave for personal reasons, they have lawful employment rights they’re free to use, and now and then an appointment just doesn’t work out even though the checks were reasonable. The aim is to cut the avoidable departures and to offer the kind of working conditions where people can make an informed decision to stay.
Understand why early attrition happens
I’d start by splitting departures into three groups, because they have different causes: people who withdraw before they travel, people who arrive but never actually start, and people who leave once they’ve begun work. If all three get rolled into one turnover figure, you can’t tell what’s going on.
Next, compare what each person was told before they said yes with what they found when they arrived. Someone hired for a skilled role might be disappointed to end up on different duties. Someone else might have expected a particular pay arrangement and then struggled because the deductions, or the payment dates, were never properly explained.
Practical things matter too. A delayed airport pickup, accommodation that isn’t suitable, a missed bus, not knowing when the first salary will land. Any of these can knock someone’s confidence quickly, especially when they’re far from family and friends. What looks like a small issue to a local manager can be really hard to fix on your own in a country you don’t know.
When someone does leave, try to hear it from them, then put their account next to the supervisor’s version and the recruitment records. I’d be careful with explanations like “lack of commitment” or “not a cultural fit”. Sometimes they’re true, but they can also cover up a problem in the employer’s own arrangements that could have been put right.
Improve job matching before an offer is accepted
Recruit against the work people will actually do rather than a broad job title. That means explaining the equipment, the working environment, the shift pattern and how much they’ll be expected to manage on their own, and then looking honestly at whether the candidate’s experience fits.
Candidates deserve a realistic picture of the workplace. A maintenance job with a lot of outdoor work isn’t the same as one based mostly inside a building, and restaurant service at a busy resort is a very different thing from working in a small cafe. Photos of the actual place, proper task descriptions and structured interviews all help people understand what the assignment involves.
Don’t take a long CV as proof that someone’s ready, either. Check their practical competence. If they need more training, agree what can be covered before they travel and what will have to be supervised after they arrive. A worker who’s struggling with tasks nobody prepared them for can lose confidence long before they’ve had a fair chance to succeed.
It’s fine to ask about availability and about any practical considerations the person chooses to mention, as long as you aren’t intrusive and you don’t make discriminatory assumptions. And give candidates the chance to decide whether the job suits them, rather than nudging them to accept before the important details are available.
Set clear expectations before deployment
There should be one approved description of the role and the employment conditions, and the employer, the agency and any sourcing partners should all be using it. It needs to cover pay and payment dates, hours and overtime arrangements, leave, accommodation, transport and any lawful deductions that apply.
Go through the contract with the worker in a language they understand, and give them time to ask questions before they travel. The ILO’s guidance on business and labour migration recommends written contracts that workers can understand, given to them in advance, with safeguards against contract substitution. A signed contract isn’t worth much if the person who signed it hasn’t understood the main terms.
I’d check understanding by talking it through rather than asking “is everything clear?” at the end of a long briefing (most people will just say yes). Ask them to describe the duties, the accommodation and how they’ll be paid, and if they’ve got something wrong, correct it respectfully.
If the offer changes, tell the worker promptly and get their agreement through the proper process. A different work location or a reduced benefit can’t just be introduced after arrival as if it had been in the original terms all along.
Design onboarding around the first days of employment
A good onboarding plan starts before the worker even arrives. Confirm who’s going to meet them, how they’ll get into the accommodation and when they’ll meet their supervisor. Then give them those details in a format they can understand, and keep a copy of the arrangements on the employer’s side.
Allow some time for people to recover from the journey and get their bearings before expecting full productivity. As well as the technical side of the job, they may need help with transport, local services, the communication channels you use and the layout of the workplace.
The CIPD’s induction guidance describes induction as a way of helping people settle into their role and the organisation, and links it to potential benefits for turnover and absenteeism. For someone who’s just moved country, I’d say that has to cover the practical side of the move as well as preparation for the job itself.
Keep the sequence clear: site induction, then safety instruction, then getting familiar with the equipment, then supervised work. And make sure their supervisor already knows the assessment results and any training that’s still outstanding, so the new starter doesn’t have to begin by proving everything all over again to someone who has no context.
Keep employer communication accessible and consistent
Workers need to know who to contact about what (pay, accommodation, transport, instructions for the work). One approachable person who can help them find their way around the organisation, and who passes specialist questions on to the right team, can help a lot.
Written notices and group messages aren’t enough on their own. Important information needs explaining in a way the employee understands, and they should have a chance to ask about things privately, because there are some matters people won’t feel comfortable raising in front of colleagues.
Managers also need to agree how they’ll communicate changes to rosters, duties and transport. If several supervisors are giving conflicting instructions, you can end up with attendance or performance problems that later get blamed, unfairly, on the worker.
There also has to be a way to raise concerns without fear of retaliation, and workers should know how complaints will be reviewed. A reporting channel only helps with retention if people can use it safely and get a meaningful response. Keep a record of the action taken, but limit who can see the sensitive details.
Review accommodation and workplace support together
Inspect the accommodation and check that the facilities match what was described during recruitment. Then ask the workers themselves. Can they get to basic services? Are they able to rest? How are repairs being handled, and how is room-sharing working out? A property can meet the booking specification on paper and still cause problems that could have been avoided.
Transport has to fit the shifts people actually work. If someone keeps missing their connection after work, or has no reliable way of getting to an early start, it soon spills over into tiredness, attendance and how they feel about the job.
I’d put extra effort into the first pay cycle. Explain what the employee will receive, when it’s due and how to read the payslip, including any lawful deductions. If there’s a discrepancy, sort it out quickly instead of waiting until the worker has raised the same thing several times.
None of this support should cost the worker their independence or their lawful rights. Employees keep access to their own identity documents, and retention must never depend on threats, restrictions or withholding anything they’re owed. The working relationship gets stronger when people can raise a problem and see it handled fairly.
Help supervisors support performance and adjustment
Often, the supervisor has more influence than anyone else on what a worker’s day is actually like. So supervisors need time, and some guidance, to explain standards, show people how tasks are done and correct mistakes constructively, particularly in the first few weeks.
Try to keep a lack of training and misconduct in separate boxes. If someone hasn’t understood a procedure, repeating the instruction more forcefully probably won’t help. Depending on the task, a demonstration, translated material or some supervised practice might be more appropriate.
Set early expectations that are achievable, and show people how their progress will be reviewed. A new worker may be able to do the core task and still need time to get used to the site’s equipment or workflow. That settling-in period should be planned for rather than automatically treated as poor performance.
Where the business genuinely supports progression, it’s worth discussing. Extra skills, clearer responsibility, or just a realistic conversation about development can help employees see what their future might look like. Managers shouldn’t make promises about promotion that haven’t been approved, though.
Use retention measures that explain what is happening
Pick an early employment period that suits the assignment (the first 30, 60 or 90 days, for example) and use the same definition consistently. For a short seasonal contract, a different review point may be more meaningful than one designed for permanent jobs.
Then track each arrival group through that period. As an illustration, say an intake has 40 starters and four of them leave within the first 90 days. That’s 10 per cent early attrition, but only once every one of those starters has actually completed the 90 days. If some joined more recently, quoting the same figure gives you a misleading comparison.
Where it helps to explain the result, separate voluntary departures from employer-initiated exits and from contracts that ended as planned. A seasonal assignment that ran its full course isn’t a retention failure. By the same token, difficult cases shouldn’t be left out just so the rate looks better.
Comparisons by role, site, supervisor, recruitment channel or intake only make sense when there are enough cases behind them. In a small group, one departure can produce a dramatic-looking percentage, so look at the individual reasons as well as the numbers.
And record what you did as well as what happened. If you changed the transport or introduced a revised induction programme, note when it started and which workers went through it. That makes it easier for managers to judge whether the change actually fixed the problem, without claiming that every shift in turnover was down to one intervention.
Build a practical early retention review schedule
The schedule below is only an illustration, and you’d want to adapt it to the contract length and your own setting. The idea is to catch concerns while they can still be resolved.
- Before travel: confirm the job terms and practical arrangements, and check the worker has understood them.
- In the first week: check arrival, accommodation, transport and access to the supervisor.
- After the first pay cycle: go through the payslip, the deductions and any questions that are still open.
- At the next scheduled review: talk about training, workload and how the employee is finding the role.
- At the end of the early employment period: review departures, any unresolved concerns and what needs to change for the next intake.
Keep the conversations practical. Ask what’s different from what they expected, what’s making the job difficult, and which issue they’d most like sorted first. Write the answers down with an owner and a follow-up date, otherwise you just end up collecting feedback that nobody acts on.
A recruitment partner can help by clarifying what candidates were told and by reviewing the selection evidence. The employer still has to deal with problems in pay, supervision, accommodation and working conditions, though, since sourcing another candidate won’t solve those.
Frequently asked questions
Can an overseas recruitment agency prevent all early departures?
No. No agency can guarantee that every employee will stay. Careful matching and good communication reduce the avoidable problems, but after arrival the employer has to provide fair conditions, effective onboarding and proper support in the workplace.
Should employers request a replacement immediately?
If a replacement is appropriate under the recruitment terms you’ve agreed, then yes, follow those terms. But look into why the person left as well. If you don’t, the next worker may run into the same unresolved problem and leave for similar reasons.
Is a lower attrition rate always evidence of better retention?
Not always. The rate has to be read alongside the observation period, the length of the assignment and the reasons people left. And it should never be brought down by preventing lawful exits or by leaving out cases that make the results look less favourable.
Support better job matching with Oman Agencies
Oman Agencies provides overseas manpower recruitment tailored to what each employer needs, with candidate screening and recruitment coordination. If you share your role specifications and the issues you’ve seen in previous intakes, our team can talk through how the sourcing and selection brief should reflect them. Get in touch to plan your next recruitment requirement alongside the onboarding and worker support your business will provide.